American Renaissance
Home      Previous Story      Next Story     View Comments      Post a Comment

Hate Crime Laws Outlined

AR Articles on Minority-on-White Crime

Race, Crime, and Violence (Jul. 1999)

The NOI Connection (Dec. 2002)

The Wichita Massacre (Aug. 2002)

Hate Crimes 101 (Nov. 2000)

The Color of Death (Sep. 2000)

More news stories on Minority-on-White Crime

Bev Darr, Hannibal Courier-Post (Mo.), Oct. 19

ST. LOUIS — Nearly 70 percent of the hate crimes in the United States are committed by young white males between ages 14 and 23, according to Karen Aroesty of the Anti-defamation League in St. Louis.

She explained that hate crimes are usually the work of “gangs of kids who are getting together to cause trouble. They do not necessarily know they are going to commit a hate crime, but that is what kids do.

“Most of the graffiti cases are kids acting out as kids,” Aroesty added, reporting these are, “kids who don’t really understand the federal hate crime statute.

“They have to be helped to understand that even if this was just kids that their conduct has enormous consequences. And even kids who make assumptions about people — they don’t understand how much they are undermining their ability to succeed.”

Outlining Missouri’s hate crime laws, Aroesty explained that the state’s original hate crime law was passed in 1998, and included offenses regarding race, religion, national origin and ethnicity.

In 1999 additional wording was added, she said. “Missouri is actually — surprisingly — progressive in its additional protection for gender, disability and sexual orientation,” which were added in 1999.

She explained that, “if the state knowingly believes that the activity committed was based on hate, that is, that the perpetrator chose the victim intentionally because the victim was or was perceived to be a racial or religious minority, then the state could seek that the penalty for the crime be increased.”

As a member of the U.S. Attorneys’ Hate Crimes Task Force, Aroesty said the type of crime that led to the town hall meeting being scheduled in Hannibal Wednesday (see related article), “is one of the reasons we formed the task force. I am a big fan of the community coming together as a whole when something like this happens.”

Nearly 70 organizations are represented in the task force, which is officially led by the U.S. attorneys from the Eastern District of Missouri and Southern District of Illinois, she said.

She noted that the task force, “had a lot to do with amending the statute in 1999.”

Original article

(Posted on October 20, 2004)

Top      Home      Previous story      Next Story      Post a Comment      Search


This is rigged.

They very seldom charge black on white crime as a “hate crime”, thus the statistics never show it. Any time it is white on black, they most likely make it a hate crime, thus it shows up in the statistics.

Something is wrong here.

Posted by RICK at 3:40 PM on October 20

Nearly 70 percent of the hate crimes in the United States are committed by young white males between ages 14 and 23, according to Karen Aroesty of the Anti-defamation League in St. Louis.

“Hate”, as you define it, Mz Aroesty. I define it as something completely different, and you better hope I never come to power.

Posted by onetwothree at 3:58 PM on October 20

“Karen Aroesty of the Anti-defamation League in St. Louis”

Collectivists promote racial and cultural diversity in socities they colonize. This allows them to remain an un-assimilated outgroup that can hide amongst many groups.

These are the people who invented racism and they use it as a political weapon. This is the Anti-Defamation League.

Posted by Tim2 at 4:19 PM on October 20

Quite frankly thats a lie, she should have said 70% of all PROSECUTED “hate crimes” were perpetrated by whites. When black kids go wilding and mug, murder and rape whites and even freely admit to “hunting whites”,as In VA earlier this year, they are not charged with “hate crimes”. Sending white youth to jail for 30 years for non violent offences, as also happened in VA this year, is what these laws are for, while true hate crimes go barely punished. Care to wager that if white youth had committed the brutal Wichita Massacre that a “hate crime” law would have been passed in time for the trial?

Posted by Bailey at 4:21 PM on October 20

Since “hate crimes” / “hate speech” / “hate thought” can ONLY be perpetrated by those eeeeeeeevil straight white conservative able-bodied, Christian/Jewish males and every other human on earth not only is exempt from committing “hate”, but in some cases encouraged to do so and lauded when they do, it’s beyond my comprehension that the number is ONLY 70% and not 100%.

Oh well - since we’re now living in a country that has laws which resemble a mix of Shar’ia, Zulu, Mestizo and ‘progressive’ (socialist to you), I’d say the only proper punishment for such horrendous crimes should befit such a high civilization.

So waddya say gang? Stoning? Beheading? Disemboweling? Re-education camp (aka ‘college’)? No Nintendo for a week?


Posted by Mike B. at 4:25 PM on October 20

Yeah - Right - - 70% of hate crimes are committed by white males. Those stats must include looking cross-eyed at OTWs. (other than whites). Always count on the ADL for smearing white people.

Posted by Quinn at 4:28 PM on October 20

“They do not necessarily know they are going to commit a hate crime, but that is what kids do. Most of the graffiti cases are kids acting out as kids,”

I thought a “hate” crime had to be motivated by “hate.”

Besides that, most graffiti does not come from white kids, it comes from black and Hispanic gangs, wannabe gang-bangers.

The Anti-defamation league continues to spew distortions against whites.

Posted by at 4:29 PM on October 20

Anyone who has a brain knows that this is a crock. I trust the color of crime report more than the government or the anti defamation league. The anti defamation league hates white people and western civilization and is determined to destroy both

Posted by at 4:36 PM on October 20

Blacks and Hispanics kill each other off every day and the “anti-defamation” League couldn’t care less.

But let some white kids paint some graffiti and they are up in arms. The hypocrisy of the ADL never ceases to amaze me.

Posted by Dennis at 4:52 PM on October 20

No, Ms. Karen, most of the hate crimes are NOT committed by young white males, but are in reality committed by mostly black males, aged 5-60 (pick any age). This is the color of crime in this country: black and now increasingly brown. Blacks hate whites and the lives of whites mean nothing to blacks. We are here to be used, abused, and shoved aside when no longer usefulor convenient. When I ran into a group of young black “Freaknikkers” a few years ago at a local gas station, they all screamed obscenities at me (for no reason, of course), and each of these obscenities were preceded by the word “white”.

I know who the real “haters” are and they aren’t white people. Oh, there a few scattered whites in this country, and I do mean a FEW SCATTERED WHITES in this whole country who have committed atrocious crimes against blacks because they were black, but the number of blacks who have committed atrocious, unspeakable crimes against whites numbers in the MILLIONS. Give me a break. Hate crimes as they are defined now are a JOKE.

Posted by sue at 5:10 PM on October 20

“Hate crimes are thought to be the most serious acts of interracial crime, but there were only 9,861 reported in 1997. Of these, 6,981 were race-related and 4,105 were violent. This very small number of crimes receives a disproportionate amount of attention, but it is likely that the millions of ordinary interracial crimes–90 percent of which are committed by blacks against whites–are more damaging to race relations. Although white-on-black hate crimes receive a great deal of attention, blacks are approximately twice as likely to commit hate crimes as whites.” from The Color of Crime.

Case closed.

Posted by Martel at 6:38 PM on October 20

She explained that hate crimes are usually the work of “gangs of kids who are getting together to cause trouble. They do not necessarily know they are going to commit a hate crime, but that is what kids do.

Sounds like an oxymoron.How many people commit crimes against people they like.By this definition any crime commited by a black person against a white person should be considered a hate crime. Every black man who rapes a white women should be considered a hate crime.I mean who could say that If a black man needed sex how couyld you say he could not get it from any black women at the drop of a hat.

Posted by Frank P. at 7:01 PM on October 20

I wonder how this statistic jibes with the FBI’s Uniform Crime Report statistics. Even these are misleading. Hispanics are considered “Hispanic” when they are victims of hate crimes, but “white” when they commit them.

Posted by M. Scott at 8:10 PM on October 20

I guess if you classify Arabs, Puerto Ricans, Mexicans, and various zambo, mestizo mixes as White you may get close to that magic 70% of hate crimes being “White”. But while non-whites, specifically kill, rape, torture and harass Whites they tend to be ignored as hate crimes by the powers that be. Not so long ago White University of Virginia Students (who were targeted by black teenage gangs in racial attacks) called for the abolition of Virginia’s Hate Crime Law. It was only used against Whites never against negroes.

Posted by Sissy White at 8:21 PM on October 20

Ms. Aroesty of the ADL needs a nose job! Starting with getting her nose out of Al Sharpton’s posterior, then putting it in an unbiased book of crime statistics, followed by poking it into some typical minority neighborhoods, so she can experience hate up close and personal. After all that, she can return to those Whites she disparaged, with her nose on the ground!

Posted by Philip Lindsey at 10:21 PM on October 20

Hate crime - Love crime,… Smelly crime - Fragrant crime,…. Ugly crime - Beautiful crime.
The adjectives really have no bearing on the guilt or innocence of a real crime. Physical assault, in most societies, is a crime. A JUST society considers the “love / hate element as a mitigating factor in the judgement of such a crime to be almost entirely irrelevant. Hate crime laws in the USA today are simply political crimes,… Nothing more, nothing less. Hate crime laws have no place in any advanced civilization. We as a country have a lot of work to do.

Posted by Dennis Kidwell at 10:24 PM on October 20

Of course blacks commit more “hate crimes.” Read the “Color of Crime.” But thats why organizations like the ADL push for colored rights. And all I can say is keep on pushing ADL, and learn for yourselves what a real “hate crime” can be. Quit creating imaginary problems when you can cause the real thing.

Posted by Frank at 12:36 AM on October 21

If you spray-paint a non-white gang symbol it’s considered art; if you spray-paint a white gang symbol it’s considered a big crime. Is that fair?

Posted by 45degreesnorth at 12:44 AM on October 21

The Anti-Defamation League makes me ashamed to be Jewish. It is groups like the ADL and Southern Poverty Law Center that make whites distrust and resent Jews. The media should simply ignore these “anti-hate” groups. Abe Foxman only has a handful of words in his vocabulary, such as: “racist,” anti-semitic,” “xenophobic,” and “homophobic”, yet still makes over a half-million dollars a year. Something is wrong with this picture.

Posted by Teddy at 12:56 AM on October 21

According to the FBI most recent hate crimes summary, in 2002 there were 11 homicides classified as “hate crimes”. In the same year, there was a total of 14,054 murders in the US. Thus, it stands to reason that over 99.9% of all killing in 2002 had nothing to do with hate. This is quite convenient, as Blacks committed more than half of all murders that year. So let no one say that Black are hateful people - they kill without malice.

Posted by Bob at 3:29 AM on October 21

Hate is now officially an emotion known only to whites.

Posted by Sigurd at 9:35 AM on October 21

There is a political career to be had here with this issue. An ambitious person only need tell the potential electorate that the issue is one of “Freedom” from this tyranny and the high ground is captured from these verminous haters of the left. Even “conservatives” would reluctantly have to follow, and the AA debate would come back into play as well. Its about asking the right questions of the electorate to guide them into our camp.

Posted by D M Simmons at 11:25 AM on October 21

She’s a liar. Blacks don’t commit those murders and rapes of us out of love.

Posted by American Woman at 11:28 AM on October 21

The ADL seems intent on fomenting hatred toward Whites at every turn. They also pushed for the Immigration act of 1965.

Defamation League is a better moniker for them.

Posted by Nostradamus Smith at 12:32 PM on October 21

“If the state knowingly believes…” is wording the likes of which you will find in any of these laws because it gives the legal out “what’s the definition of ‘is’ ” needed to maintain a clean PC perspective.

Death by a 1,000 cuts begins to be noticed at around 850. We are in the 900’s as the culture and society founded hundreds of years ago. The fools in the ADL are no different from any other appeaser. Those who dealt with Hitler were incapable of understanding that they were also targets, not just the countries of central Europe.

Posted by George at 1:22 PM on October 21

Anyone who thinks that whites commit 70% of hate is seriously delusional. There is no other way of putting it. ADL needs to realize that the political spectrum in North America is changing. Whites are rapidly becoming a minority and are becoming a target for every imaginable non-white aggression. Organizations like ADL only speed up this process. And just imagine if the economy tanks one of these days. We’ll all be afraid to show our face - there will be no choice but to go to a police state format. Bye, bye democracy.

And guess what - third worlders assume (like almost everyone else but a few anti-semites and jews) that Jews are white! The propaganda is one day gonna come full circle. What’s ADL going to do when cities like New York are overrun by third world populations and low level crime engulfs everything? Are the Jews they are protecting going to move to the ‘racist’ country side, behind high-secured fenced-in neighbourhoods, or simply go to Israel? The embarassingly short-term thinking from organizations like ADL has crossed the line from annoying to delusional and dangerous. People of Jewish descent need to make a calculation and quick - what’s more dangerous - a white majority or a third world majority?

Posted by Tom Peters at 1:38 PM on October 21

I am the Sue of the above post too. I forgot to put fromGA but I have something else to add.

I have been told by more than one young black that his mother told him if he ever stole/killed/etc. from someone, to steal/kill/etc. from a white man. I believe with all my heart and mind that blacks target whites when they plan to commit a crime, and the statistics will probably back this up. But, when they commit crimes out of passion, in the heat of the moment, then the victim is probably another black. We certainly see that in the news, too. One black shoots another in a card game, or over a tv show, over a woman, over a drug deal gone bad, etc. But when they go out with the intention of committing a crime, they target white/asian/mexican people. Think convenience stores, restaurants, etc. I know this seems to hold true here in the Atlanta area.

Each of these blacks who commits a crime against someone other than a black is probably guilty of a hate crime as it is now written. But, of course, this is not politically correct, and of course the blacks charged with this would be so disproportionate as compared to whites, that we would hear blacks squealing all over this country. So, of course, pc baloney such as this article is just that: baloney.

Posted by suefromGA at 2:21 PM on October 21

To Teddy. I have read so many things about Jews being behind all of this anti-white legislation and PC nonsense. It is hard not to believe it true. I was surprised to read what you said. Please inform me and the AR readers the truth because I do not want to dislike Jews and if you guys are getting a bad rap I would like to know it. I am glad that we have Jews in this battle on our side if that is the case. We need Jewish people to let us know that it is just a few elite Jews the same way it is a few elite white guys trying to destroy us. I believe the Jews are some of the smartest people around so when it appears a lot of Jews are backing programs that anyone with half a brain knows to be false it makes us wonder. Get more Jewish people on this sight to enlighten us. Our cause is your cause.

Posted by Brad at 5:39 PM on October 21

“Nearly 70 percent”

Maybe the other 30 percent are minorities that committed crimes against individuals who happened to be Jew or Gays.

Posted by 45degreesnorth at 7:19 PM on October 21

Bravo Teddy. You’re not the only Jew reading, but you’re the only one talking. Good for you.

Posted by Sigurd at 8:06 PM on October 21

To Brad,

I can’t presume to know what goes on in the minds of the Abe Foxmans and Mark Potoks out there. All of my friends are Gentile and there were only a handful of other Jewish kids at my high school. I also went to a public university and not some Ivy League school. We have to assume that at least some of what Kevin Mcdonald says is true and that there are some Jews (if only a small minority) that have advanced certain political and intellectual movements for ethnic reasons. But by far the thing that I was most disturbed to find out about is that certain Jewish figures and groups played a prominent role in the passage of the 1965 Immigration Act. Third World immigration has also swamped Europe (though I have no idea how Jews in Europe feel about it). Anyway, it wasn’t a very smart move in the long term. I would rather be surrounded by whites who historically have at least tolerated me (most of the time) than by Muslims who would like to see me dead and by whites who never had anti-semitic feelings at all until they started looking into why immigration laws changed in the first place.

Posted by Teddy at 3:42 AM on October 22


“There was never any report of it in the major papers,TV, or even internet newswires I can recall seeing.”

You are 95% correct but it WAS reported by Curtis Sliwa, a talk show host on WABC in NYC. I didn’t see it in any of my local papers nor did I hear anything about it either on the radio or TV.

Were it not for the Internet and “Right Wing” talk radio, no one would know about the horror in Wichita which, in my opinion, was one of the worst in my memory for it’s sheer savagery.
DOes anyone remember Missy McLaughlin? She was abducted by a car full of black males on the streets of Charleston SC on New Years Eve several years ago, taken to a trailer park and with the help of some black females was gang raped (her tormenters even invited some neighbors in to participate) immersed in a tub of bleach and then taken by car to the Interstate, shot in the head and tossed out of the car. She lived long enough to make a statement to police who upon arriving at the trailer, found piles of anti- white hate literature. It was reported that a black city councilman tried to stifle the publicity about the case in order not to “divide” the community.

Amazing that when a black perpetrates a racially motivated crime the black leaders immedately call for “healing” but when in the rare cases of a white crime committed against a black, there is suddenly a lack of desire for reconciliation on the part of the self-appointed black leaders.
Everyone was shocked by the OJ Simpson verdict but jury nullification is almost a “given” in a case where the defendant is black and the victim white and when the jury is all black or a majority of blacks. There are many stories of white jurors who were intimidated by their majority black co-jurors. On the other hand statistics show that, in general, white jurors tend to look at the quality of the evidence rather than at the color of the defendant.

Posted by Taurus689 at 9:25 AM on October 22

The linked article actually states the opposite:

Blacks arrested more
for ‘hate crimes’

FBI report confirms higher rate than whites for racial attacks

Although “hate-crime” legislation has been championed by minority groups in hopes it would discourage racially motivated crime, a recently released FBI crime report reveals that a higher percentage of blacks than whites are charged with race-biased “hate crimes

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, blacks make up 12.8 percent of the population — or about 35.4 million of the country’s 280 million people — so, given the arrest rate versus population percentage, the data indicates that blacks are one-and-a-half times more likely to be arrested for a “hate crime” than whites.

Posted by Hengst at 9:27 AM on October 22

Hispanics are classified as white when they commit hate crimes and as Hispanics when they are “victims.”

Posted by junius at 9:49 AM on October 22

As a proud Jewish American, I am also sick to death of organizations like the ACLU and ADL propagating their antiamerican and anti white agenda. More than any other people, Jew’s should be aware that they’ve never had it so good as they do in the U.S. I believe that most do, but a large minority of snot nosed, whiny malcontents seem not to have learned historys
painfull lessons.

Posted by Steve at 11:15 AM on October 22


You’ll probably never see this, but I ASSURE you that there are PLENTY of Jews who read Amren.

I’ve written about this before, but it was about 2,000 words and I don’t have the space to paste it here.

Suffice it to say (and this is the REALLY simplistic version), that there are two types of Jews:

1.) The guilt-ridden, self-hating, spineless leftists (the ones I call “Great Neck” Jews (Great Neck is a neighborhood on the Queens/L.I. border).

2.) ‘Right thinking’ Jews — who DESPISE the people represented in #1.

Again - I could also direct you to approximately 1,000 - 2,000 - 3,000 - many more articles, but after a while, you just run out of time and energy.

Here’s JUST two sites (if you don’t know them already), which contain ‘mostly’ ‘right thinking’ Jews (there are many more, but this is good enough for a start — and BTW, I always direct people over there to Amren, so it works both ways):

(The ‘sort of’ Jewish Amren - not a real big fan of Neo-Nazis, Arabs, blacks, illegal aliens, etc.):

(If you’re in love with Palestinian homocide bombers, don’t bother going here):

Posted by Mike B. at 12:34 PM on October 22

More comments.

Jews need to be VERY careful about all this race issue. Sure, Hitler was nasty, but just what kind of world are you going to find when the white race is obliterated? You think the Africans and Arabs are going to be NICER than the goofy insulting white race? DOn’t count on it.

TO me, the best FRIEND of the Jewish people is the white race. We are going to end up like you. YOu had the last 2,000 years of persecution since you wanted to retain your language, heritage and “race”. The next 2,000 years may be the persecution of the whites. We need each other and the Jewish community, especially those of you who own the media and banks, need to switch sides and SUPPORT all white nations. You need us and we need you.

In addition, since HATE crimes can only be committed by whites, why is the numer 70%? It should be 100% since no other race can commit a crime based on hate. I guess the other 30% is white on white crime which is not hate, but most likely falls under “sexism” or “against the poor” or some other PC tosh.

Posted by RICK at 1:12 PM on October 23

Top      Home      Previous story      Next Story      Search

Post a Comment

Commenting guidelines: We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage debate. Statements of fact and well-considered opinion are welcome, but we will not post comments that include obscenities or insults, whether of groups or individuals. We reserve the right to hold our critics to lower standards.

Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)