American Renaissance

Ailing Hospital’s Progress Is Lesson for King/Drew

AR Articles on Blacks in Charge
Black World Not Ours (Jan. 2002)
Keep Greed Alive (Dec. 2001)
Uncivil Wrongs (Sep. 2001)
More Phantom Racism? (Oct. 2000)
New York (Atro)city (Feb. 1996)
Racism Everywhere (Aug. 2000)
Chicago Still Stewing (Sep. 2001)
Tragedy or Farce? The Return of Marion Barry (Nov. 1994)
Search for Blacks in Charge
More news stories on Blacks in Charge
Solomon Moore, Los Angeles Times, Nov. 25

WASHINGTON — Greater Southeast Community Hospital in Washington D.C. had been stripped of its national accreditation, dropped by medical insurance companies and was being investigated for six “preventable” patient deaths between 2002 and 2003.

But over the last year, hospital administrators have been working to turn the medical center around.


Krasker came to Southeast as a medical detective of sorts, trying to determine what was going wrong. He found, for example, that the system for matching blood types to patients was faulty. Three patients had died at the hospital because they had received the wrong blood type. Nurses, Krasker concluded, had incorrectly labeled patients’ blood samples, prompting him to institute standardized rules.

“What I found at Greater Southeast — and what appears to be a problem at King Drew — is that essential safe practices of healthcare were generally lacking,” he said.

Both hospitals were founded in predominantly black neighborhoods, where many residents feel their healthcare needs have long been neglected. Both have struggled to provide proper care to the streams of patients that sometimes overwhelm the facilities.


“There were people telling me that I hated black people,” said Walks, who is African American.

Original article

(Posted on November 29, 2004)

     Previous story       Next Story       Post a Comment      Search


Home      Top      Previous story       Next Story      Search

Post a Comment

Commenting guidelines: We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. Statements of fact and well-considered opinion are welcome, but we will not post comments that include obscenities or insults, whether of groups or individuals. We reserve the right to hold our critics to lower standards.

Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)