American Renaissance

Home       Previous Story       Next Story       View Comments       Post a Comment

Residents Sue Over Herndon Day-Laborer Site

AR Articles on Common Sense in High Places
Convincing the Conservatives (Nov. 2002)
Nationalist Politics (Part II) (Oct. 2002)
The Great Refusal (Mar. 2002)
More news stories on Common Sense in High Places (Washington, DC), Sept. 1

WASHINGTON — Six residents of Herndon, Va., sued the town Thursday over its plans to provide funding for an employment site to serve day laborers, many of whom are believed to be illegal immigrants.

The lawsuit, filed in Fairfax County Circuit Court, alleges that the Town Council violated federal, state and local law last month when it voted 5-2 to establish a regulated site for day laborers on public land with a $170,000 county grant.

The residents are represented by the conservative legal group Judicial Watch, which said it believes its lawsuit is the first of its kind to challenge the legality of taxpayer-funded day-labor sites. These sites have sprouted up in Maryland, northern Virginia and other places with large immigrant populations.

The debate in Herndon captured national attention as town officials sought a solution for loitering day laborers who congregate in a convenience store parking lot, waiting for contractors or others to come by offering part-time work or odd jobs.


Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said that no matter the problem, facilitating the hiring of illegal immigrants is not an acceptable solution.

“The Town Council understands it would be helping illegal aliens” by establishing a day laborer site, Fitton said Thursday during a news conference at the group’s Washington headquarters. “It has essentially admitted it in some proceedings.”


Original article

(Posted on September 6, 2005)

Top      Home      Previous story       Next Story       Post a Comment      Search


Top      Home      Previous story       Next Story      Search

Post a Comment

Commenting guidelines: We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. Statements of fact and well-considered opinion are welcome, but we will not post comments that include obscenities or insults, whether of groups or individuals. We reserve the right to hold our critics to lower standards.

Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)