American Renaissance

Home       Previous Story       Next Story       View Comments       Post a Comment

House Immigration Bill Places Onus on Employers

AR Articles on Common Sense in High Places
Convincing the Conservatives (Nov. 2002)
Nationalist Politics (Part II) (Oct. 2002)
The Great Refusal (Mar. 2002)
More news stories on Common Sense in High Places
Stephen Dinan, Washington Times, Dec. 6, 2005

The House Republican immigration-enforcement bill will include a measure aimed directly at ensuring that employers are taking steps to hire legal workers — going a step further than the White House has gone in targeting businesses.

The bill, which Judiciary Committee Chairman F. James Sensenbrenner Jr. of Wisconsin is expected to introduce today, calls on employers to check documents submitted by new employees against a database to verify their authenticity.

“This is the one thing you can really do that really will work,” said Rep. Ken Calvert, a California Republican who has been fighting for the provisions for years. “You’re not picking one group of people or another group of people. All you’re doing is checking the validity of a Social Security card — I don’t know how anybody can be against that.”

Named the Basic Pilot Program, it began in the mid-1990s as a voluntary system for employers in a handful of states to check prospective employees’ Social Security numbers. In 2003, it was expanded nationwide, but it is still voluntary. Mr. Sensenbrenner’s bill would make it a requirement.

Mr. Sensenbrenner, who as committee chairman is writing the bill, will call on employers to recheck the documents of all employees hired within the past six years. Mr. Calvert’s version does not.

{snip}

Original article

(Posted on December 6, 2005)

Top      Home      Previous story       Next Story       Post a Comment      Search

Comments


Top      Home      Previous story       Next Story      Search

Post a Comment

Commenting guidelines: We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. Statements of fact and well-considered opinion are welcome, but we will not post comments that include obscenities or insults, whether of groups or individuals. We reserve the right to hold our critics to lower standards.




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)