American Renaissance

Governor Gets Illegals Bill

AR Articles on Immigration Law
The Green Card Crap Shoot (May 2003)
Fade to Brown (May 2003)
A Chronicle of Capitulation (Aug. 2002)
Immigration: The Debate Becomes Interesting (Jul. 1995)
Search for Immigration Law
More news stories on Immigration Law
Jim Tharpe and Carlos Campos, Atlanta Journal-Constitution, March 29, 2006

The Georgia General Assembly’s attempt to confront illegal immigration won final legislative approval Tuesday. But anyone expecting quick results will be disappointed.

Even the author of the Georgia Security and Immigration Compliance Act has stressed that his bill will not solve most Georgians’ complaints about people who are in the country illegally.

“It took 30 years to get here, and we’re not going to solve it overnight,” said state Sen. Chip Rogers (R-Woodstock), who wrote the 13-page bill. “This is a multiyear process.”

The measure, Senate Bill 529, won final approval Tuesday in the Georgia House

119-49 in an anticlimactic, procedural vote. Gov. Sonny Perdue is expected to sign the bill into law but has not indicated when.

Many of the things the bill does address will not be dealt with for more than a year at the earliest. And some key provisions will not kick in until near the end of the decade.

The bill requires government agencies to verify the legal status of any adult applying for taxpayer-provided benefits. But the bill exempts things like prenatal care and treatment for communicable diseases.

And the bill did not even attempt to deal with what are estimated to be the largest costs: emergency medical care for illegal immigrants or the ability of their children to attend public schools. Those taxpayer-supported services have been guaranteed by the federal courts.

‘This is the art of politics’

Major provisions of the bill are aimed at employers who hire illegal immigrants. The measure attempts to guarantee that employees of companies that hold public contracts hire only workers who are legally in the country, beginning July 1, 2007, for large companies. The provision for the smallest employers would not be triggered until July 1, 2009.

A centerpiece of the legislation, a provision that would attempt to make private employers hire only legal workers, would not kick in until the 2008 tax year. That means enforcement would not come until 2009.

Rogers said he wanted an earlier trigger date, but powerful farming and business interests weighed in with legislators in their districts. The message was clear: Activate this part of the proposal too soon and it won’t pass.


Earlier this week, lawmakers deleted a section of the bill that would have imposed a 5 percent fee for illegal immigrants wiring money out of the country, because they feared it could not withstand legal scrutiny.

Proponents say the legislation is needed because the federal government has failed to secure the borders, allowing waves of illegal immigrants to flood Georgia — estimates range from 250,000 to 800,000. Supporters of a crackdown say they have overburdened the state’s taxpayer-supported services while paying few taxes.


“I am very relieved that the Georgia Legislature has listened to the 82 percent of Georgians who demanded that something be done here to begin to address the illegal immigration crisis,” said D.A. King, an illegal immigration opponent from Cobb County. “Many people will now see the true determination of the illegal alien lobby who will spend a lot of money challenging this in federal court.”

Tisha Tallman, regional counsel for the Atlanta office of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, said SB 529 is potentially unconstitutional because it pre-empts federal law. MALDEF, which has challenged similar measures in other states, is considering a lawsuit if SB 529 is signed into law, she said.

Original article

(Posted on March 29, 2006)

     Previous story       Next Story       Post a Comment      Search


Home      Top      Previous story       Next Story      Search

Post a Comment

Commenting guidelines: We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. Statements of fact and well-considered opinion are welcome, but we will not post comments that include obscenities or insults, whether of groups or individuals. We reserve the right to hold our critics to lower standards.

Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)