American Renaissance

MEAP Results Highlight Sizeable Gap Among Races, Socioeconomic Groups

AR Articles on Race and Intelligence
A King Among Men (Apr. 2003)
The Global Bell Curve (Dec. 2002)
The Definitive Word on Intelligence (Sep. 1998)
Race and Intelligence: The Evidence (Nov. 1992)
Research That Was to Prove Jensen Wrong Proves Him Right (Mar. 1994)
Search AmRen.com for Race and Intelligence
More news stories on Race and Intelligence
Judy Putnam, Saginaw News (Mich.), March 14, 2006

Joseph Ellison is pleased with Saginaw Township’s latest Michigan Educational Assessment Program test results, but the district’s curriculum director suspects the devil lies in the details.

In the coming weeks, Ellison and other school administrators across the state plan to delve into the achievement gap to determine how black students stack up against their white counterparts.

The issue merits inquiry because the gap between Michigan’s white and black students widens dramatically between third and seventh grades, particularly in math, new test reports indicate.

Statewide, the percent of students considered proficient in math dropped across the board by the eighth grade. But the decline was accelerated among black and economically disadvantaged students.

{snip}

Among white students, 92 percent statewide were considered proficient in math in third grade, compared with 71 percent of black students.

By eighth grade, 72 percent of white students were proficient, compared with 34 percent of black students.

That means there is a 38-point gap in eighth-grade math scores between white and black students. The gap is even larger among seventh-graders — 41 percentage points.

Falling math scores have grabbed the attention of Gov. Jennifer M. Granholm and lawmakers, who are debating ways to help improve them.

{snip}

Original article

(Posted on March 15, 2006)

     Previous story       Next Story       Post a Comment      Search

Comments


Home      Top      Previous story       Next Story      Search

Post a Comment

Commenting guidelines: We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. Statements of fact and well-considered opinion are welcome, but we will not post comments that include obscenities or insults, whether of groups or individuals. We reserve the right to hold our critics to lower standards.




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)