Home Previous Story Next Story View Comments Post a Comment
Senate Panel Approves Plan to Hire 10,000 More Border Officers
|AR Articles on Pandering Politicians|
|Fade to Brown (Apr. 2003)|
|Neo-Con Games (Mar. 2002)|
|It’s Race, Stupid (Jan. 2001)|
|More news stories on Pandering Politicians|
A Senate committee signed off on a plan for hiring thousands of new Border Patrol officers while eliminating a plan to build 700 miles of fencing along the U.S.-Mexico divide.
The Judiciary Committee agreed on a plan to add roughly 10,000 agents to the ranks of Customs and Border Protection over the next five years. It also adopted an amendment from Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., to replace old fences only in high-population areas along the Arizona border, and required the detention of non-Mexican immigrants caught illegally crossing the border, ending the so-called “catch and release” policy.
Kyl’s proposal includes funding for the increased use of technology such as video cameras and infrared sensors to stop border-crossers, rather than extending the 15-foot-high fencing already in place in San Diego and elsewhere.
Senators had clashed over whether the 700 miles of fencing would be an effective deterrent to would-be illegal immigrants. Texas Republican John Cornyn said such a barrier would cost billions of dollars and send a “dramatically negative message” about the nation’s attitude toward its neighbors.
Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., said he supported the idea of a fence along the border. The technology components are just a “detection device,” and not a true barrier, he said.
The vehicle barriers in the amendment adopted Thursday would be concrete and steel posts spaced several feet apart. The barriers — many of which are already in place along the border — stop cars from crossing but cause less disruption to wildlife than a fence would.
The committee also adopted an amendment requiring the detention of non-Mexican illegal immigrants caught crossing the border. Under the “catch and release” policy, those border-crossers were released with an order requiring them to appear at an immigration hearing, because detention facilities are typically too full to hold them all. Supporters said it would close a loophole that allows illegal immigrants to ignore those court appearances and slip into the country undetected.
(Posted on March 10, 2006)