American Renaissance

Home       Previous Story       Next Story       View Comments       Post a Comment

Another New Bill Tries to Raise Cap on H-1B Visas

AR Articles on Pandering Politicians
Fade to Brown (Apr. 2003)
Neo-Con Games (Mar. 2002)
It’s Race, Stupid (Jan. 2001)
More news stories on Pandering Politicians
Marianne Kolbasuk McGee, Information Week, May 2, 2006

While Congress is bogged down debating far-reaching and controversial immigration reform, a new bill proposing to raise the ceiling on the number of H-1B visas issued annually to technology and related professionals was introduced into the Senate on Tuesday.

The new “Securing Knowledge, Innovation and Leadership” legislation, dubbed the Skil Bill, has many of the same provisions proposed in other legislation being debated by Congress, including immigration reform bills introduced earlier this year by Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter (R-Penn.).


Currently, the annual cap on H-1B visas is 65,000. The bill proposes to raise the ceiling to 115,000, with options to increase the cap annually by 20% based on the needs of employers. The United States received the maximum number of allowable petitions for H-1B visas in fiscal 2006 six weeks before the fiscal year even began.

The Cornyn bill also proposes allowing employers to pay a premium fee to expedite the processing of an immigrant petition and provides for a “precertification system” to streamline the processing of certain nonimmigrant and immigrant petitions.

The Skil Bill was co-sponsored by Senators George Allen (R-Va.), Wayne Allard (R-Colo.), Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.), Bob Bennett (R-Utah), and Trent Lott (R-Miss.).

Original article

(Posted on May 5, 2006)

Top      Home      Previous story       Next Story       Post a Comment      Search


Top      Home      Previous story       Next Story      Search

Post a Comment

Commenting guidelines: We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. Statements of fact and well-considered opinion are welcome, but we will not post comments that include obscenities or insults, whether of groups or individuals. We reserve the right to hold our critics to lower standards.

Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)