American Renaissance

Riverside Oks Illegal Aliens Measure

AR Articles on Immigration Law
The Green Card Crap Shoot (May 2003)
Fade to Brown (May 2003)
A Chronicle of Capitulation (Aug. 2002)
Immigration: The Debate Becomes Interesting (Jul. 1995)
Search for Immigration Law
More news stories on Immigration Law
Jim Walsh, Courier-Post, July 27, 2006

The passions behind the nation’s immigration debate boiled over here Wednesday night before the township committee unanimously approved a measure that would punish people who provide housing or jobs to illegal immigrants.

At an often stormy meeting, about 700 people alternately cheered and heckled those who spoke for and against the controversial measure.


But the Rev. Miguel Rivera, the representative of a national clergy group, was loudly jeered when he said, “Our main concern is the animosity that this type of measure creates.”

Violators would be subject to fines of up to $1,000 and other penalties. Employers could lose their local business licenses.

The two sides were split over a local population of illegal aliens, mostly from Brazil — a group believed to number between 1,500 and 3,500 people, Mayor Charles Hilton Jr. said.

The town’s population was about 8,000 before the influx of “nondocumented aliens,” the mayor said.


But critics said the measure would cause ethnic profiling and would penalize the American-born children of immigrants. They also said immigration reform should be accomplished at the federal level.

“The problem is discrimination,” said Ronaldo Empke, a Brazilian who moved here about two years ago. “If you read the history of Riverside, it was built on immigration. Why is it a problem now?”

Many Latinos wore pink ribbons to show solidarity.


Original article

(Posted on July 27, 2006)

     Previous story       Next Story       Post a Comment      Search


Home      Top      Previous story       Next Story      Search

Post a Comment

Commenting guidelines: We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. Statements of fact and well-considered opinion are welcome, but we will not post comments that include obscenities or insults, whether of groups or individuals. We reserve the right to hold our critics to lower standards.

Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)