Where You Live Linked To Life Expectancy
Lauran Neergaard, AP, September 11, 2006
Washington — Where you live, combined with race and income, plays a huge role in the nation’s health disparities, differences so stark that a report issued Monday contends it’s as if there are eight separate Americas instead of one.
Asian-American women living in Bergen County, N.J., lead the nation in longevity, typically reaching their 91st birthdays. Worst off are American Indian men in swaths of South Dakota, who die around age 58 — three decades sooner.
Millions of the worst-off Americans have life expectancies typical of developing countries, concluded Dr. Christopher Murray of the Harvard School of Public Health.
Asian-American women can expect to live 13 years longer than low-income black women in the rural South, for example. That’s like comparing women in wealthy Japan to those in poverty-ridden Nicaragua.
Compare those longest-living women to inner-city black men, and the life-expectancy gap is 21 years. That’s similar to the life-expectancy gap between Iceland and Uzbekistan.
Health disparities are widely considered an issue of minorities and the poor being unable to find or afford good medical care. Murray’s county-by-county comparison of life expectancy shows the problem is far more complex, and that geography plays a crucial role.
“Although we share in the U.S. a reasonably common culture … there’s still a lot of variation in how people live their lives,” explained Murray, who reported initial results of his government-funded study in the online science journal PLoS Medicine.
Consider: The longest-living whites weren’t the relatively wealthy, which Murray calls “Middle America.” They’re edged out by low-income residents of the rural Northern Plains states, where the men tend to reach age 76 and the women 82.
Yet low-income whites in Appalachia and the Mississippi Valley die four years sooner than their Northern neighbors.
He cites American Indians as another example. Those who don’t live on or near reservations in the West have life expectancies similar to whites’.
This more precise measure of health disparities will allow federal officials to better target efforts to battle inequalities, said Dr. Wayne Giles of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which helped fund Murray’s work.
The CDC has some county-targeted programs — like one that has cut in half diabetes-caused amputations among black men in Charleston, S.C., since 1999, largely by encouraging physical activity — and the new study argues for more, he said.
“It’s not just telling people to be active or not to smoke,” Giles said. “We need to create the environment which assists people in achieving a healthy lifestyle.”
The study also highlights that the complicated tapestry of local and cultural customs may be more important than income in driving health disparities, said Richard Suzman of the National Institute on Aging, which co-funded the research.
“It’s not just low income,” Suzman said. “It’s what people eat, it’s how they behave, or simply what’s available in supermarkets.”
Murray analyzed mortality data between 1982 and 2001 by county, race, gender and income. He found some distinct groupings that he named the “eight Americas:”
Longevity disparities were most pronounced in young and middle-aged adults. A 15-year-old urban black man was 3.8 times as likely to die before the age of 60 as an Asian-American, for example.
That’s key, Murray said, because this age group is left out of many government health programs that focus largely on children and the elderly.
Moreover, the longevity gaps have stayed about the same for 20 years despite increasing national efforts to eliminate obvious racial and ethnic health disparities, he found.
Murray was surprised to find that lack of health insurance explained only a small portion of those gaps. Instead, differences in alcohol and tobacco use, blood pressure, cholesterol and obesity seemed to drive death rates.
Most important, he said, will be pinpointing geographically defined factors — such as shared ancestry, dietary customs, local industry, what regions are more or less prone to physical activity — that in turn influence those health risks.
For example, scientists have long thought that the Asian longevity advantage would disappear once immigrant families adopted higher-fat Western diets. Murray’s study is the first to closely examine second-generation Asian-Americans, and found their advantage persists.
(Posted on September 13, 2006)
Peter Aldhous, New Scientist, September 12, 2006
When it comes to life expectancy, the US is far from one nation. According to a new analysis of health disparities, there are in fact eight Americas — some of them more reminiscent of developing countries than a global superpower.
Life expectancy in the US varies widely by race and socioeconomic status. Now researchers led by Majid Ezzati of the Harvard School of Public Health have thrown geography into the mix. They examined death records for people in more than 3000 counties and divided the population into eight groups according to race, income and geographic location.
Some groups were confined to a relatively small area — Native Americans in the western states, for example. Another group, labelled “Middle America”, was mostly white, fairly wealthy, and accounted for the majority of the population.
There were dramatic differences in life expectancies: in 2001, urban black male babies could expect to live for just 68.7 years, whereas for Asian females the figure was 86.7. Such differences across the “eight Americas” have not narrowed over the past two decades.
Rural south to inner cities
International comparisons reinforce the picture of a deeply divided country. When Ezzati examined the probability of dying during youth (15 to 44 years) or middle age (45 to 64), the figures for black men — whether in the rural south or inner cities — looked more like those seen in the developing world than in other rich countries.
In contrast, the results for Asians and Middle Americans were similar to those of the UK and Japan.
Income and access to healthcare explained little of the variation. For instance, poor white people living in the northern plains are similar to those in the Mississippi valley and Appalachia by these measures, yet tend to live longer.