|AR Articles on Europe|
|Prospects for our Movement (Feb. 27, 2004)|
|Europe on the March (Jun. 2002)|
|Can Europe Learn the Lessons of Yugoslavia? (Sep. 2001)|
|Germany: Islamic Gangrene (Nov. 1999)|
|Race in Scandanavia (Dec. 2003)|
|Search AmRen.com for Europe|
|More news stories on Europe|
An analysis from Christian Lambert, a former French ambassador, writing at Les 4 Vérités, predicts a terrible fate for Europe. He titles his essay, “The Inexorable Suicide of Europe.”
The Brussels administration admits officially that each year some 550,000 immigrants from Africa, the Middle East and China, plus South America, enter the European Union. In reality the figure is twice that, in other words, more than a million.
We will briefly take it country by country.
Italy wins the prize right now. For this to become known, a young Italian girl had to be raped and murdered by a Gypsy. Then Rome was forced to reveal that Italy, a country even more poorly governed than France, which is saying a lot, now has 3.7 million immigrants (the official figure), that 700,000 new arrivals were recorded in 2006, and that 560,000 Gypsies have settled there. More than 100,000 of them arrived in the ten-month period after January 1, 2007.
More than 50% of the crime in Italy is due to these “Rumanians”. In addition, every year some 60,000 immigrants from Tunisia and Libya (where even Colonel Qadhafi admits that his country is invaded by Sub-Saharians waiting to get into Europe and certain to succeed in their goal) arrive in Italy via the island of Lampedusa. In general, it is easy to enter Europe through Italy where the administration is “lax” …
In Greece, it’s worse and Cyprus is one of the great doors of entry into Europe.
In France, nothing has changed. It can be assumed that 350,000 new arrivals enter our country each year, 70% of them from Africa. The number of visas granted has not lessened. It is still more than 2 million — 2,038,000 in 2006 — which proves that the fight against massive immigration is, like all the rest, purely verbal.
While I’m on the topic, I should note in passing that the town of Aulnay-sous-Bois, in Seine-Saint-Denis, has just experienced 4 days and nights of street fighting between gangs of “Afro-Maghrebins” and the police, according to the press itself. At Villiers-le-Bel, Val d’Oise, it is even more serious. The police, attacked with rifles, proved to be impotent. In order to quell these riots military units specializing in street fighting are now necessary, especially since stockpiles of war weapons from the Balkans are being stashed in the suburbs.
In Germany there are 4 million Turks, and new arrivals every day. One German told me that Islamist Turks feel more at ease practicing their religious activities in Germany than in Muslim Turkey.
In Great Britain, 50 powerful Muslim associations control millions of faithful followers, mostly Pakistanis. In the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, beneath the smile of her gracious very Christian Majesty, there are now koranic schools where children can learn to become kamikazes and blow up automobiles.
In the Netherlands where there are many North African, Caribbean and Indonesian Muslims serious trouble is on the increase. The press writes that the situation is becoming “à la française”, in other words: pillaged shops, torched cars, violent confrontations with the police.
Scandinavia is not to be left out where, in order to be in tune with the times, Norway discovered and recruited, as a government minister, a black woman from Martinique.
I might add that there is no common European policy on immigration. Spain and Italy amnestied millions of illegals — a tremendous message for others — without even informing their neighbors.
On the other hand, in the countries of Eastern Europe, there are no immigrants. Why? Because these countries were subjected to communism and are therefore underdeveloped, with no welfare state or free hand-outs, housing, health care or schools.
Some say that one must not exaggerate. The great invasions from the 4th to 7th centuries eventually worked themselves out, didn’t they? Great ignorance. We have to realize that these invasions had only a limited effect on the population of nascent France. As a matter of fact, in general, gangs of invaders and vandals, totaling only a few thousand individuals did not settle down in France, except for the Franks to the East. Furthermore, these barbarians quite rapidly converted to Christianity, more precisely to arianism.
It is true that at the time the merovingian monarchy did not distribute to these barbarians welfare of all kinds, declaring: “You are a great opportunity for France. Come, all of you, and join us with your large and beautiful families.” No. Back then, people still had common sense.
And now, what will happen? In the short term, immigration will continue to flood in. Problems which have never been this serious will continue to spread and worsen. In the very long term, Europe, which created the most beautiful civilization that humanity has ever produced, will disappear.
The suicide of Europe is not unavoidable — there are many solutions. The fact that there are no leaders willing to do what must be done is the problem. Another strange fact is that so many people seem to “sense” that this is inevitable, as if they have an insight, or an intuition, that Europe’s time has come. These are the people besotted by what they see on television and dumbed down by an inferior education. They turn a commentary such as this article into a self-fulfilling prophecy.
(Posted on December 27, 2007)
The EU is opposed to nationalism and ethnic-based nation-states because it is a supra-nationalist organization. It welcomes immigration because it weakens nation-states, it’s political enemy.
Posted by at 2:43 PM on January 1
It’s significant that Marc Robertson sees what another (anonymous) poster rightly characterised as “the demographic re-engineering” of Europe simply as the responsibility of “the far left”.
Actually, what has happened is this:
1) The free-market faction prevailed within the conservative movement.
2) The politically-correct faction prevailed within the socialist movement.
3) Having prevailed within their own movements, the free-marketeers and the PC brigade realised the radical compatibility of their respective projects (economic and sociocultural deregulation, respectively) and have now formed the permanent coalition (irrespective of party labels) that we now see in the so-called “advanced” democracies.
Mass immigration/multiculturalism appeals to the free-market right, because it creates a low-wage workforce; it appeals to the PC left because it subverts the existing culture (which they hate), and ultimately replaces it.
How sad for all of us at 180 degrees to this coalition, who are socioculturally conservative and genuinely patriotic, but would like to see the otherwise politically unaccountable free market tamed by regulation and, where appropriate (e.g. in natural monopolies like public transport and utilities), public ownership.
We have been disenfranchised by mainstream politics - an opportunity for serious nationalist political movements!
Posted by Johnny English at 12:05 PM on January 2