American Renaissance

Court Backs Novato Student’s Protected Speech

Bob Egelko, San Francisco Chronicle, February 20, 2008

The U.S. Supreme Court left intact Tuesday a ruling that said Novato school district officials violated a student’s freedom of expression when they confiscated a high school newspaper because of an editorial attacking illegal immigrants.

The ruling, issued last May by a state appeals court in San Francisco, relied on a California law that protects freedom of the press in public schools more strongly than the constitutional rights guaranteed under the First Amendment.

Tuesday’s Supreme Court order, which denied a hearing sought by the Novato Unified School District, means that California students “will be able to publish very controversial political opinions without fearing retribution,” said Paul Beard of the Pacific Legal Foundation, a lawyer for the student who wrote the editorial.


High school senior Andrew Smith wrote the editorial for the Novato High newspaper, the Buzz, in November 2001 when he was 18. He said immigrants should stay out of the country if they can’t go to the trouble of becoming citizens.

Authorities “should treat these people the way cops would treat a suspected criminal,” Smith wrote. “If a person looks suspicious then just stop them and ask a few questions, and if they answer, ‘Que?’ detain them.”

After some students and parents protested, school district officials pulled remaining copies of the newspaper out of circulation and sent a letter to parents saying the editorial shouldn’t have been published.


The school district “succumbed to the fear of disruption and discontent” when it removed the newspaper from circulation, the state court said. Smith was awarded $1 and a declaration that his rights had been violated.


Original article

(Posted on February 21, 2008)

     Previous story       Next Story       Post a Comment      Search


Home      Top      Previous story       Next Story      Search

Post a Comment

Commenting guidelines: We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. Statements of fact and well-considered opinion are welcome, but we will not post comments that include obscenities or insults, whether of groups or individuals. We reserve the right to hold our critics to lower standards.

Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)